on 18-07-2018 07:46 AM
on 18-07-2018 05:23 PM
Lyndal, if you dont have either of the following DL, passport or Immicard, a help line ph no is provided
on 18-07-2018 06:21 PM
Thanks for the information.....I was born in Australia, have never driven and never had a passport.
Some years ago I applied for a NSW Proof of age card issued by the RTA....I had to pay a small fortune and jump through more hoops to prove my identity than anyone applying for a drivers licence. It is the most expensive and useless piece of plastic I have in my wallet and has never ben useful for anything, much less proving my identity as I was promised it would do.
18-07-2018 06:41 PM - edited 18-07-2018 06:45 PM
@lyndal1838 wrote:Thanks for the information.....I was born in Australia, have never driven and never had a passport.
Some years ago I applied for a NSW Proof of age card issued by the RTA....I had to pay a small fortune and jump through more hoops to prove my identity than anyone applying for a drivers licence. It is the most expensive and useless piece of plastic I have in my wallet and has never ben useful for anything, much less proving my identity as I was promised it would do.
PIA re your POA card, it would appear that applying for any type of gov card, is usually fraught with probs. I know when hubs applied for his disability card for the car, the paperwork went back and forth a few times, cause ( apparently )it handn't ben filled out correctly and he's is quite an intelligent man
I think if you wish to opt out, it may create a difficult situation for some elderly people who dont/cant use the Internet ( or dont even own a puter ), ..... I can think of 3 ladies in my street who would fall into that category .....
on 20-07-2018 12:30 PM
In my own personal opinion, I think systems like this should be 'opt in' not opt out. It should be a personal choice, not Governments taking liberties that ignore democracy and privacy that so easily can be used as weapons not only here, but in dictatorships and countries that make an art form of internet theft, espionage, corporate abuse and interference in private lives.
For example, it would be so simple for companies such as insurance agencies to hack into something like 'My Health Record' and use it against their clients to deny them access to insurance or health claims.
Clearly, like anything else online, anything a computer literate human can do, another computer literate human can undo, history up to the present day demonstrates that.
21-07-2018 09:47 AM - edited 21-07-2018 09:48 AM
My thoughts are how do we know that our records are actually unable to be accessed or even been accessed before we got the option to 'opt out'.
on 21-07-2018 11:12 AM
I think that the answer is "we don't know". All anyone can do is hope that that is not the case and do the best they can with the scenario offered and hope it works.
It's runaway technology in any area, so there are serious limitations to protections no matter what as far as the internet is concerned. Some areas have been out of control for a long time and that is not likely to be remedied any time soon.
21-07-2018 11:47 PM - edited 21-07-2018 11:48 PM
"A major cyberattack on Singapore's government health database has stolen the personal information of about 1.5 million people, including Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, the Government says."
and, closer to home:
"There is no social licence for My Health Record. Australians should reject it
. . . One of the most devastating and under-discussed flaws in the scheme is that it opens access to health data to a slew of parties beyond primary care providers.
In the UK the scheme’s principal proponent, Tim Kelsey said, “It’s about creating new industrial entrepreneurial opportunities for great apps developers over here; existing large vendors over there – to engage with the public estate, to transform the experience for citizens in England [sic],”
but, this new medical records system should be about (ultimately) the improved delivery of health care to Australians, not about private enterprise making money from our data.
and, as the news article goes on to state . .
"This difference of mission, between a tool for seamless information flow between patients and their healthcare providers, and a platform for industrial entrepreneurship, isn’t a mere detail – it is absolutely fundamental. And it demonstrates a grave and irresponsible miscalculation by the ADHA: one that becomes inexcusable given what should have been learned from the catastrophic English experience."
I have opted out.
on 31-07-2018 10:48 PM
Federal Health Minister Greg Hunt has bowed to pressure and agreed to tear up the controversial legislation behind the My Health Record to protect patients from having their medical records accessed by police.
Following crisis talks with the head of the Australian Medical Association in Melbourne on Tuesday night, Mr Hunt confimed in a statement that the My Health Record Act will be redrafted.
"The amendment will ensure no record can be released to police or government agencies, for any purpose, without a court order," the statement said.
"The Digital Health Agency’s policy is clear and categorical - no documents have been released in more than six years and no documents will be released without a court order. This will be enshrined in legislation."
More here -
Mr Hunt said the reform would "remove any ambiguity on this matter".
He added that the legislation would also be amended to ensure that if any Australian wished to cancel their record, they could do so permanently, with their record deleted from the system.
on 01-08-2018 10:01 AM
i'm beginning to reasses my view on this legislation, i'm leaning much closer to the opt-out option than i was thanks to the media actually doing its job and pulling the thing apart to expose hidden truths.
on 01-08-2018 12:45 PM
Yet another Liberal "stuff up" .... does that party EVER think anything through BEFORE they introduce it?????