on 16-05-2014 03:46 PM
I found this but could someone explain process of voting leading up to and process of a Double Dissolution? Thanks.
Solved! Go to Solution.
on 16-05-2014 03:54 PM
The Senate has to refuse to pass a bill twice, with a 3 month gap between votes. If the Senate sends the bill back a 2nd time, the Government go to Gov General and ask for Government to be disolved.
on 16-05-2014 03:51 PM
on 16-05-2014 03:54 PM
If the House of Reps and the senate fail to reach an agreement on a piece of legislation twice, then, the government can ask the GG to dissolve both upper and lower houses which result in a new election being called.
on 16-05-2014 03:54 PM
The Senate has to refuse to pass a bill twice, with a 3 month gap between votes. If the Senate sends the bill back a 2nd time, the Government go to Gov General and ask for Government to be disolved.
on 16-05-2014 03:55 PM
When the Upper and Lower Houses are deadlocked.
16-05-2014 03:57 PM - edited 16-05-2014 03:59 PM
thanks people.
Aren't there moves afoot to 'change' voting so that it will be harder at an election for minority parties to get elected?.....
Also, saw this headline "Clive Palmer to run for PM if double dissolution called"
http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/clive-palmer-to-run-for-pm-if-double-dissoluti...
on 16-05-2014 03:59 PM
@paintsew007 wrote:thanks people.
Saw this headline "Clive Palmer to run for PM if double dissolution called"
http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/clive-palmer-to-run-for-pm-if-double-dissoluti...
I hope not
on 16-05-2014 04:01 PM
oh no, not sure I''d want Clive for PM lol
perhaps hes banking on everone casting protest votes
on 16-05-2014 04:05 PM
to az and debs. Yeah! a bit of a worry.
Honestly the state that our Federal Parliament has gotten into, it's shameful. They should ALL be put out to do time in the community for 6 months I reckon.....for wasting our time, money and not representing us diligently but puttinging their self interests first.
on 16-05-2014 04:09 PM
found this:
Double Dissolution
The House of Representatives chamber
A double dissolution can only happen when there is a deadlock between the two houses of Parliament; it usually occurs at the request of the Prime Minister.
Purpose
The Australian Constitution gives almost identical powers to the House of Representatives and the Senate. A bill (proposed law) must be agreed to by both houses in order to become law. The drafters of the Constitution saw the possibility of a deadlock occurring between the two houses, in which there may be disagreement over a bill. Section 57 of the Constitution provides a mechanism to resolve the disagreement, by dissolving both houses of Parliament and calling an election to let the voters decide what the outcome will be. The double dissolution mechanism only relates to a bill that originates in the House of Representatives.
Procedure
Section 57 of the Australian Constitution details the conditions for a double dissolution:
More than one bill may act as a trigger for a double dissolution.
Once these conditions (called triggers) have been met, the Prime Minister may recommend to the Governor-General that a double dissolution of the Parliament take place. A federal election then follows for all members of the House of Representatives and all senators.
A double dissolution cannot take place within six months of the end of a three-year term of the House of Representatives.
Joint sitting of Parliament
After a double dissolution election, the bill(s) which triggered the double dissolution may be presented to both houses of Parliament again. If a deadlock occurs once more, the Governor-General may order a joint sitting of both houses of Parliament. At a joint sitting, all members of parliament from both houses meet together to vote on the bill(s). A joint sitting has only occurred once in the Australian Parliament, in 1974.
In this instance, the government led by Prime Minister Gough Whitlam had a majority of nine votes in the House of Representatives but did not have a majority in the Senate. By April 1974, the Senate had twice refused to pass six bills and these became double dissolution triggers. The Prime Minister requested the Governor-General to use section 57 to dissolve both houses of Parliament and call an election for 18 May.
The government won the election but with a reduced majority in the House of Representatives; it still did not have a majority in the Senate. The disputed bills were again introduced into and passed by the House of Representatives. The Senate again rejected the bills. As a result, the Governor-General convened a joint sitting of both houses of Parliament on Tuesday 6 August and Wednesday 7 August 1974 to vote together on the bills. Three of these bills related to electoral matters, two related to health insurance and one related to setting up the Petroleum and Minerals Authority. The Whitlam government held a majority of all the combined votes, with government members voting together to ensure that the six bills were passed by an absolute majority of all members of parliament.
History
There have been six double dissolutions of the Australian Parliament: in 1914, 1951, 1974, 1975, 1983 and 1987. In 1914, 1975 and 1983, the government lost the election that resulted from the double dissolution. The most famous of these double dissolutions occurred in 1975. The Senate refused to pass the supply (Budget bills) of the government, led by Prime Minister Gough Whitlam. This caused a deadlock which could be used as a double dissolution trigger. The Prime Minister did not want a double dissolution election; however, Governor-General Sir John Kerr dismissed the government and an election was called by caretaker Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser.