on โ03-11-2013 10:04 PM
Are they allowed to ask for your phone to look at what you have just texted or just been texted??
My Miss got pulled over today cause the policeman said he saw her head look down.
on โ03-11-2013 10:55 PM
@am*3 wrote:Where would that get you Crystal.?.
On a TV highway patrol show
on โ03-11-2013 10:59 PM
I also think it because she is a pretty young woman.
on โ03-11-2013 11:11 PM
@crystal**flake wrote:I also think it because she is a pretty young woman.
So am I but they don't ask for my phone
โ03-11-2013 11:31 PM - edited โ03-11-2013 11:33 PM
Young drivers (usually alone) do get pulled over more often than the oldies.
Lucky they didn't notice no p plates crystal...that is quite a big fine isn't it.? They weren't doing their job properly then.
on โ03-11-2013 11:47 PM
Best to do as Mr Policeman says, I fear. The charge 'perverting the
course of justice' is a wide web indeed. And they like to use it often
on โ03-11-2013 11:50 PM
No way a policeman or any other person could demand my mobile phone records.
Not going to ever happen.
Because i don't have one and never have had one.
Oh, the freedom.
At no one's beck and call
Unconcatable unless I'm at home.
โ04-11-2013 12:23 AM - edited โ04-11-2013 12:25 AM
@crystal**flake wrote:Ok........... I'm going to put a spanner in the works........
Miss had forgotten to put her P's on the car she was driving and the policman didn't even notice that.
well, that has provoked a few thoughts, lol
has your daughter not got her own car with permanent P plates fixed in place?
or did she take the almighty TE50 for a blast without sticking the P plates on?
on โ04-11-2013 04:38 PM
@crystal**flake wrote:The driving lights.........................
OMG the policeman turned off her driving lights so she wouldn't blind drivers coming towards her? ~roll eyes~
on โ04-11-2013 04:53 PM
on โ04-11-2013 05:27 PM
If he had reasonable cause to suspect she had been using it while driving, he can ask to look at when the most recent activity took place.
Refusing could then be taken as failing to follow reasonable direction of a police officer.
At least I see that as a good thing, as he gave her some benefit of doubt. Here, you'll just be handed the fine, and if you wish to dispute it, do so in court, with whatever evidence you have. And our state government has now even given us the special privelidge of paying the court costs whichever way the case goes.
As for switching off her driving (fog) lights, that was yet another good gesture on his part, instead of fining her for contravention of Australian Road Rule 217.