k)wB(U~$(KGrHgoOKjoEjlLmErDsBJ1I)Z1mWQ~~_7.JPG?set_id=81 "purplecarrot-top"){kind=avatar}
@i-need-a-martini wrote:
@silverfaun wrote:It was ludicrous to see the hatred in their faces when Mr Hockey disproved their accusations. A set up audience but Mr Hockey did a wonderful job even with all the interruptions and trying to shut him down by Jones.
Great job Joe
Were we watching the same show??
He didn't disprove anything because he didn't answer anything. Jones let him ramble on and ONLY "shut him down" when he rambled too far from the question and the original audience member wanted/needed to clarify in order to get him back on track.
The only major interruption occurred at the start when someone heckled him and Jones handled that swiftly and firmly and it didn't happen again.
The only person that got "shut down" was Jones when Hockey would arrogantly put his palm in Jones face to stop Jones from requesting him to stick to topic.
He had a whole hour to prove himself with no interruptions, no debate and with a predominantly LNP audience. And yet he still came across as seriously untrustworthy and untruthful.
There were conditions attached to his appearance.
No heckling from audience
No pressure to answer from Jones
@cq_tech wrote:
What a pity he couldn't have shown some integrity and been a little more truthful though.
You left out compassion, that was severely lacking.
@silverfaun wrote:It was ludicrous to see the hatred in their faces when Mr Hockey disproved their accusations. A set up audience but Mr Hockey did a wonderful job even with all the interruptions and trying to shut him down by Jones.
Great job Joe
A set up audience? Really?
