Shame the system didnt have the same morals

[the_hawk*]

the streets would be safer for our kids if the system wasn't so corrupt and protected pedophiles, One has to wonder why they are so protective???? Hinch walks free after 50-day jail-term

http://au.news.yahoo.com/vic/a/21861554/hinch-to-walk-free-after-50-day-jail-term/?cmp=fb

[lakeland27]

i think he was miffed about ending up at langi, which specialises in that kind of offender. he thought they'd sent him to durringole (spelling) the prison farm.

[lakeland27]

---

@polocross58 wrote:

It was about principle

---

yes , about 100k worth,

[azureline**]

---

@lakeland27 wrote:

---

@polocross58 wrote:

It was about principle

---

yes , about 100k worth,

---

however, he broke the law. That is not the way to get the law changed is it??

[the_hawk*]

---

@azureline** wrote:

that's what I said..... had he paid the fine, he would not have gone to Gaol.. it wasn't about pedophiles...........

---

no thats not what you said, what was the fine for? 

[azureline**]

yes, I did.

It was in the link you posted? didn't you read it?

Hinch was found guilty of contempt of court in October last year for breaching a suppression order relating to murdered Melbourne woman Jill Meagher.

Victorian Supreme Court Justice Stephen Kaye said the former broadcaster's web posts, in which he breached the order, had been populist, self-serving and grossly irresponsible.

It was Hinch's sixth conviction for contempt of court or related offences, a record which Justice Kaye said was disgraceful.

[the_hawk*]

---

@azureline** wrote:

---

@lakeland27 wrote:

---

@polocross58 wrote:

It was about principle

---

yes , about 100k worth,

---

however, he broke the law. That is not the way to get the law changed is it??

---

But it gets it out there and people talking about it doesnt it and from that the system can begin to understand the general population is sick of all the cover ups and coruption from the top down

[the_hawk*]

---

@azureline** wrote:

yes, I did.

It was in the link you posted? didn't you read it?

Hinch was found guilty of contempt of court in October last year for breaching a suppression order relating to murdered Melbourne woman Jill Meagher.

Victorian Supreme Court Justice Stephen Kaye said the former broadcaster's web posts, in which he breached the order, had been populist, self-serving and grossly irresponsible.

It was Hinch's sixth conviction for contempt of court or related offences, a record which Justice Kaye said was disgraceful.

---

yes now you have it

[azureline**]

Why not go through the right channels instead? and change the system, he has the money, doesn't he?

[polocross58]

I clicked Kudos for you by mistake

Slip of the finger.  Should have been a click on Reply

and my reply was to say that while people froth and carry on online

Hinch is out there putting himself on the line and drawing attention to the farce that is law

How many here are prepared to suffer for principle and for what they believe is corruption and foulness in society and wiithin the legal system?

I'd take one of Hinch against almost the entire population of this country

and I'd certainly have one of Hinch rather than the disgusting farces of political and legal cockroach-nests any day

Does my heart good to see the Aussies who support Hinch

but I don't see too many on the ebay boards

[para-sights]

If his antics weren't so self serving I might see him slightly as a media martyr. Plus I can't fail to see the hypocrisy of consistently preaching about criminals while consistently breaching laws himself. You can't decry a criminal while becoming one yourself.