Should global warming be a hush topic when there are severe bushfires?

[donnashuggy]

I don't think so, what do others think?

[fourandsixpants]

ref. your comment: "FYI......two children have been arrested for starting the fires in NSW........kiddie arsonists....."

what? ....2 or 3 or even 4 children started over 80 fires that started in different locations in NSW at the same time?...........

....................*guffaw!! chortle ROFL

...........*picks up tin foil hat that's fallen off due to hysterical laughing and rolling around on the floor

[fourandsixpants]

ref your comment:" I have just read that a fifth child has been implicated in the bushfire's....."

....probably incorrect ....there are probably 300 children or more children guilty of lighting fires- curious, have a lighter or a box of matches doing it just to see what happens......but honestly!! How many of these incidents occur where the incident gets out of hand? where the kids don't quickly and instinctively put out what they have started ??  *wow*

now the best you can do is blame innocent children for this whole fiasco....for over 80 bushfires? get real!! LOL 

[siggie-reported-by-alarmists]

---

@paintsew007 wrote:

ref. your comment: "FYI......two children have been arrested for starting the fires in NSW........kiddie arsonists....."

what? ....2 or 3 or even 4 children started over 80 fires that started in different locations in NSW at the same time?...........

....................*guffaw!! chortle ROFL

...........*picks up tin foil hat that's fallen off due to hysterical laughing and rolling around on the floor

---

You find children starting  bushfire's in NSW funny?.......   Your comments are disgraceful.

[fourandsixpants]

No, not at all.

Your suggestion by subtle inference that children are to be blamed for the fires.....all 80 of them. This I find hilarious when you refute any other reasons for these fires having happened.

I find your suggestion here disgracefully and embarrassingly simplistic and tunnel visioned.

.....you don't like it that I use smilies to convey my opinion yet you mercilessly continue to deride any comments I may make-you also make unfounded and incorrect accusations that I am a conspiracy theorist in pathetic attempts to discredit my opinions.

[lakeland27]

the comments are correct (as far as the kids go) there were 90 odd fires at one stage. too many for the firebugs to be the culprit. Haarp on being equally unlikely a scapegoat.

[fourandsixpants]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bushfires_in_Victoria#Common_causes

Stats :         By number of fires     - lightening      26%

                                                     - cigs/matches  7%

                    By area burnt            - lightening 46%

                                                     - cigs/matches  less than 1%

[siggie-reported-by-alarmists]

---

@paintsew007 wrote:

No, not at all.

Your suggestion by subtle inference that children are to be blamed for the fires.....all 80 of them. This I find hilarious when you refute any other reasons for these fires having happened.

I find your suggestion here disgracefully and embarrassingly simplistic and tunnel visioned.

.....you don't like it that I use smilies to convey my opinion yet you mercilessly continue to deride any comments I may make-you also make unfounded and incorrect accusations that I am a conspiracy theorist in pathetic attempts to discredit my opinions.

---

  The police have arrested the children......it will not only be their opinion, as they would have based their arrests on proof.

  I don't believe the police have accused them of starting all the fires....... They are accused of starting multiple fires though.

   I'm sure others reading your posts will find them as distasteful as I do. 

[fourandsixpants]

DARPA has taken over HAARP earlier this year. http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread964298/pg1

http://www.wanttoknow.info/war/haarp_weather_modification_electromagnetic_warfare_weapons

"

To watch this engaging 15-minute CBC documentary online, click here. For an even more detailed and revealing 45-minute History Channel documentary on HAARP and other secret weapons used for electromagnetic warfare, click here. Below are two quotes from the History Channel documentary:

"Electromagnetic weapons ... pack an invisible wallop hundreds of times more powerful than the electrical current in a lightning bolt. One can blast enemy missiles out of the sky, another could be used to blind soldiers on the battlefield, still another to control an unruly crowd by burning the surface of their skin. If detonated over a large city, an electromagnetic weapon could destroy all electronics in seconds. They all use directed energy to create a powerful electromagnetic pulse."

"Directed energy is such a powerful technology it could be used to heat the ionosphere to turn weather into a weapon of war. Imagine using a flood to destroy a city or tornadoes to decimate an approaching army in the desert. If an electromagnetic pulse went off over a city, basically all the electronic things in your home would wink and go out, and they would be permanently destroyed. The military has spent a huge amount of time on weather modification as a concept for battle environments."

For those who still doubt that such devastating secret weapons have been developed, here is an intriguing quote from an article in New Zealand's leading newspaper, the New Zealand Herald:

"Top-secret wartime experiments were conducted off the coast of Auckland to perfect a tidal wave bomb, declassified files reveal. United States defence chiefs said that if the project had been completed before the end of the war, it could have played a role as effective as that of the atom bomb. Details of the tsunami bomb, known as Project Seal, are contained in 53-year-old documents released by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade."

[fourandsixpants]

Your opinion on behalf of all the other readers would be insulting.

I am sure others can post for themselves.

....as for finding my opinions/comments distasteful?.....up to the individual really.

[twinkles**stars]

---

@paintsew007 wrote:

No, not at all.

Your suggestion by subtle inference that children are to be blamed for the fires.....all 80 of them. This I find hilarious when you refute any other reasons for these fires having happened.

I find your suggestion here disgracefully and embarrassingly simplistic and tunnel visioned.

.....you don't like it that I use smilies to convey my opinion yet you mercilessly continue to deride any comments I may make-you also make unfounded and incorrect accusations that I am a conspiracy theorist in pathetic attempts to discredit my opinions.

---

2 fires started here turned into 12. The first 2 were started by the same person which resulted in 10 more spot fires from those first two. One person were definately resonsible for ALL of those fires!

There is nothing funny or laughable about fires...full stop!