22-09-2014 08:59 AM - edited 22-09-2014 09:00 AM
11-10-2014 07:37 PM - edited 11-10-2014 07:40 PM
@bushies.girl wrote:
And that's not oppression?
Not really IMO. Sometimes I don't want to answer my door.
I have the same address, but different suburb, as a gun shop.
Get numnut rednecks knocking. Do ya think I wanna answer my door often?
Mostly people who know me, call ahead, or I may not answer.
Like I said, if you are a worker, the doorbell would go unanswered as well,
so what's the difference?
11-10-2014 07:40 PM - edited 11-10-2014 07:41 PM
Not wanting to and not being allowed to are hardly the same thing imo
on 11-10-2014 07:47 PM
@bushies.girl wrote:
Not wanting to and not being allowed to are hardly the same
Semantics.
i.e. you're not allowed to park in a No Standing Zone,
but sometimes you want to.
Is that also oppression? Or a law?
They have their own laws
I choose not to argue about muslims, either way. It does not affect me at all.
And I have no interest, except for my first post above re the Irish girl
and the burqa
11-10-2014 07:51 PM - edited 11-10-2014 07:52 PM
Yeah, I dont have a lot of interest either 🙂 Much more important things in my life atm 🙂
on 11-10-2014 07:52 PM
@serendipityricho wrote:Live in a country town-never see a burqa wearer.
Hate the baseball cap on backwards and manners of some aussie youth...Richo.
Live in a city suburb - never see a blue singlet.
Hate the rebarbative akubra and manners of some sod busters...VI.
on 11-10-2014 07:56 PM
V.P---whatever.
on 11-10-2014 07:56 PM
@am*3 wrote:Yes, already got that from iap*s posts.
Do we always have to account for the 1% or less of people who think a man may be under a burqa? I think not.
Burqa's are blue anyway.
If we are going to make a loud noise for the -1% of people who wear the black material I think we can cater for other small numbers of enquiring people. We don't have another whited sepulcher on our hands do we?
on 11-10-2014 08:10 PM
@azureline** wrote:Obviously, "was" is the appropriate word....................... there are still women who wear what pleases their partners.
Yes and it's called oppression. Male dominance.
on 11-10-2014 08:15 PM
@bushies.girl wrote:
Ahhh ty for correcting my grammar 🙂 Much appreciated 🙂
huh? no, I wasn't correcting your grammar.
on 11-10-2014 08:20 PM
@icyfroth wrote:
@azureline** wrote:Obviously, "was" is the appropriate word....................... there are still women who wear what pleases their partners.
Yes and it's called oppression. Male dominance.
I am not sure I would agree with that. It's not oppression if you choose to do it because he likes it. I don't think I was oppressed because mine didn't like curry and I made something else instead.