@*julia*2010 wrote:
I just watched this again she is 100% guilty and the cop should be given a gold medal for his professionalism and she should be retried in court. The paper she signed and her palm print/sweat or whatever should be sent to the lab for forensic testing and if proven she should do the full 15 years jail for perjury. If the cop didn't have the video footage imagine all the internal investigations he would have had to go through with and the suspicion from investigators. The cop should also be promoted by at least 2 ranks for having to prove himself.
http://gregology.net/2010/05/the-proposed-burqa-ban/
I gimped this scene to illustrate my point.
Who is the dodgy one? There are 6 anonymous people in this scene, Mr Guy Fawkes, the helmet clad woman, the burqa clad woman, the child with the pixelled face, the baby under the cover, and whoever is watching them all on the security cameras. It’s funny how governments and the media focus on the form of anonymity that best suits their agendas. It’s a great way to distract us from the issues that will actually affect us like peak oil and unsustainable population growth. I’m not pro islam, I think their imaginary friend is as crazy as that of any other religion, but I don’t think we’re in a position to throw stones. Our indecency exposure laws forbid women from exposing their chests in public yet men are free to do so. My solution is walking around naked with an electronic burqa (infrared LEDs on a head band which blind security cameras), that way I can p*** off everyone but not get caught by the fashion police 
....thought this line of thinking most appropriate here.
