THE BUDGET THREAD

nero_bolt
Community Member

Have your say on the budget and what you think of it after its released.

 

 

Message 1 of 254
Latest reply
253 REPLIES 253

Re: THE BUDGET THREAD


@spotweldersfriend wrote:

@poddster wrote:

@am*3 wrote:

They will create work schemes? Demeaning type work maybe... weeding parks, removing graffiti from public places etc


Watch the unemployment figures drop, no more freebie hols


 

Watch the crime rate rise.

watch the suicide rate rise Woman Sad

Message 121 of 254
Latest reply

Re: THE BUDGET THREAD

Overall I am totally happy with the budget. The $20 Billion to medical research is perfect for me and where I am heading so very happy with that. 

 

the only thing I don't agree with is the 6 months wait for unemployment benefits and six months on and six months off it... that is going to make people homeless. I have actually messaged my local mp about this as I am very concerned about the repercussions. Not many people have a six months supply of cash in the bank to pay the rent. 

 

I am just hoping that there are some extremes in the budget so that the government has something to bargain down. That is usually what most governments do to make it so they can work through a hostile senate. 

 

I am happy to pay the $7 to see a Dr. I am happy to pay extra for my meds.... that I can understand because I work in the health industry and see the extreme stress the system is under. 

 

Anyone that voted for the Coalition knew that these sort of cuts were coming. 

Message 122 of 254
Latest reply

Re: THE BUDGET THREAD


@boris1gary wrote:

Is there any promise not broken?


I know... remember all those promises that Swan made about a surplus??? 

 

I hate it when politicians lie to us and break promises

Message 123 of 254
Latest reply

Re: THE BUDGET THREAD


@azureline** wrote:

Anything so far? I am confused about the PBS, does that mean my FIL will have his pensioner discounted meds doubled? $91 pm currently.


Yes I do believe that is so but the Safety Net is going to be reduced so they pay more initially bet get to the free level faster 

Message 124 of 254
Latest reply

Re: THE BUDGET THREAD


@boris1gary wrote:

Is there any promise not broken?


Yep, the corporate tax rate will be cut

Message 125 of 254
Latest reply

Re: THE BUDGET THREAD


@alexander*beetle wrote:

I'm a bit in shock really. I don't even know where to start. I just got home from work and found a post on another forum. $2 million has been taken from the Royal Commission into Child Abuse. Devasting. Let alone all the other cuts to essential services, families, the young, the old, the sick. I'm just gobsmacked. This would be because it was set up during labour. Yet they've put aside $250million for their own Royal Commissions. There are no words to even describe how I feel. 


Wow, I hadn't heard about that one. They should be ashamed.

 

Message 126 of 254
Latest reply

Re: THE BUDGET THREAD

Good on ya...job well done!.....

Message 127 of 254
Latest reply

Re: THE BUDGET THREAD


@boris1gary wrote:

So do I Erica.Woman Mad


All the 'fundraising' and violation of the right of free speech it looks as though a Government and a whole system of Government has been illegally overthrown ie;a coup 

What Next? a revolution?

Message 128 of 254
Latest reply

Re: THE BUDGET THREAD


@catsnknots wrote:

@azureline** wrote:

Anything so far? I am confused about the PBS, does that mean my FIL will have his pensioner discounted meds doubled? $91 pm currently.


Yes I do believe that is so but the Safety Net is going to be reduced so they pay more initially bet get to the free level faster 


Doing a bit of reading... for a person on a concession card they will pay and extra .80 cents per script and the safety net will increase by 2 scripts. 

Message 129 of 254
Latest reply

Re: THE BUDGET THREAD

reply to am*3

 


@boris1gary wrote:

@debra9275 wrote:

6 months is too long IMO


any time delay is too long. Businesses are to be given a cash incentive to hire over 50's, yet young people are going to be punished because there is high unemployment.


Hire over 50's that are on the dole ($10 000 paid to employer).

Lots of over 50's looking for work that aren't on the dole also.

 

6mths is too long for a person who loses their job by no fault of their own. Those who get a job and work 1 day and quit because they don't like it is different.

...............................................................................................................................................................................................................

 

Apparently the employer does not get the $10,000 paid up front - this amount is paid over several years (which is not much of an incentive to employers as does not come close to covering wages). It has been suggested that after the 'pay out' period has finished the over 50 year old worker would be sacked. The minimum wage is probably all that this over 50 yr old would receive whilst in an unskilled job- which this Coalition is looking at dropping! The minimum wage amount at present is carp. Not all skilled/even multi-skilled over 50's can get work in their areas of expertise, as there are no *bleeping* jobs!!! Don't people get IT?!......so this is a way to 'force' over 50's regardless of their held qualifications into MORE (useless) 'reskilling' carp, where a pittance is paid, which they need in order to eat and the on the job experience is picking up rubbish, sorting rubbish at the recycling plant, building roads or planting trees for 6 months-SLAVE LABOUR baby!!......and the unemployment figures will look glorious for the Coalition because this is what this tactic is all about-helping the Coalition and their unemployment figs look brilliant-they don't give a toss about REAL JOBS. ......but wait, this is NOT a new idea.....it's ALL been done before....... AND FAILED.

 

Capitalist investors want to end up with more money than they started out with, but why? Is it just to live in luxury and consume? It is possible to envisage such an economy on paper. Marx did, and called it “simple reproduction”, but only as a stage in the development of his argument. By “simple reproduction” he meant that the stock of means of production was simply reproduced from year to year at its previously existing level; all of the profits would be used to maintain a privileged, exploiting class in luxury. As a result production would always remain the same and the circuit keep on repeating itself unchanged. This of course is not how capitalism operates. Profits are capitalised, i.e. re-invested in production, so that production, the stock of means of production, and the amount of capital, all tend to increase over time. The economic circuit is thus money-commodities-more money-more commodities, even more money. In order to make more money, money must be transformed into capital.

This is not the conscious choice of the capitalists. It is something that is imposed on them as a condition for not losing their original investment. Competition with other capitalists forces them to re-invest as much of their profits as they can afford to in keeping their means and methods of production up to date. They cannot act contrary to the inner nature of capitalism which requires the constant accumulation of capital and the opening of new markets throughout the world. And it cannot avoid that increasing productivity of labour which means more production for less expenditure of labour.

The capitalist claim we as workers enter a free contract and “no one is forced to do anything.” – But what planet are they on? The working class is forced each and every day into wage slavery or does money in capitalism grow on trees and all people need to do it pluck it from the branches to pay for food clothing and shelter. No, we are, collectively, compelled under the threat of poverty to sell our capacity to work – our labour power – in order to get access to those things. http://socialismoryourmoneyback.blogspot.com.au/2012/11/wage-slavery.html

 

Message 130 of 254
Latest reply