To Publish Or Not To Publish.

German Magazine Bild has published a picture of Kate Middleton's bare bottom which was exposed as her dress flew up after she alighted from a helicopter during her recent visit to the Blue Mountains in NSW:

 

Spoiler
kates bum.jpg

German newspaper Bild features the shot on their website along with another  picture of Kate in Canada in 2011 when her yellow Jenny Packham dress did  exactly the same thing.

Both pictures were taken shortly after she disembarked from a helicopter,  with the wind from the propellers causing her dress to blow up.

The photographs have sparked comments online about why Kate doesn't wear  weights in her hems like the Queen to avoid future wardrobe mishaps.

One Twitter user wrote: "Why doesn't she weight her hems?"

 

Full Article Here

 

What I want to know is, why isn't she wearing any underwear?

Message 1 of 52
Latest reply
51 REPLIES 51

Re: To Publish Or Not To Publish.


@joz*garage wrote:

mmm, gotta hand it to the photographer


Yes, I can understand that response.. I'm sure it was with men like you in mind that he snapped it and hawked it around  the magazine industry.

Message 11 of 52
Latest reply

Re: To Publish Or Not To Publish.

Apparently another member of the Royal Household has curtain weights sewn into the hemline of her frocks, to avoid embarrassing little encounters with breezes and winds.

 

Spoiler
Message 12 of 52
Latest reply

Re: To Publish Or Not To Publish.

I heard that the photo netted the clicker $100,000.

Message 13 of 52
Latest reply

Re: To Publish Or Not To Publish.

can't of been for men like myslef ol' wise one, i don't buy magazines


Signatures suck.
Message 14 of 52
Latest reply

Re: To Publish Or Not To Publish.

your new 'avatar' makes you look 40 years younger.

Message 15 of 52
Latest reply

Re: To Publish Or Not To Publish.

she's wearing thong underwear,obviously. why shouldn't she,and why should she have to wear a dress with weights in it? she only MARRIED royalty,you know. besides the fact that that whole concept is just ridiculous anyway.

being born into a certain family doesn't make you anyone but a member of that family. 

i grew up in massachusetts,where the kennedys lived. all they had was money and politics to make them"royalty",and it certainly didn't make them nice people.

why can't people just let these people be a nice young couple raising their child and having fun? the "prince" isn't ever going to control the world,or even england. geez... i just don't get it.

taste my religion! nibble a witch! ๐Ÿ˜„
Message 16 of 52
Latest reply

Re: To Publish Or Not To Publish.


@paintsew007 wrote:

your new 'avatar' makes you look 40 years younger.


only as old as you feel

and everyone knows what icy is feeling

Message 17 of 52
Latest reply

Re: To Publish Or Not To Publish.

thats right sin, shes just another person, and i say; if ya got it... flaunt it


Signatures suck.
Message 18 of 52
Latest reply

Re: To Publish Or Not To Publish.


@paintsew007 wrote:

your new 'avatar' makes you look 40 years younger.


 lol

 

Spoiler
it's Diane Keaton   

 

Message 19 of 52
Latest reply

Re: To Publish Or Not To Publish.

what a lot of rot. Heard of photo shopping?

Hype by anti-royalists IMO.

Message 20 of 52
Latest reply