Unhinged Vitriolic Speech

silverfaun
Community Member

This disgusting swan song from a Green was lauded on here as a milestone and a rival to Gillards misplaced misogyny rant.

 

The people who support this type of hate speech are not indicitive of the wider Australian people and to applaud this type of hate  is appalling.

 

I will stand up to this type of thing and so will the majority of Australians. This person is not fit to be in parliament and he should be rejected wholeheartedly by everyone, which he will be come the WA re election, and good riddance to him and his ilk:

 

 

SPORTING dark suit and speaking in a calm, measured tone, Scott Ludlam is the acceptable face of the Greens.

 

He has spoken out previously against the “people’s revolt” against the carbon tax that sparked the “Ditch the Witch” nastiness.

 

Ludlam’s style is the antithesis of histrionics such as the current appalling rock concert concoctions of a fake prime ministerial beheading.

 

This week the West Australian senator rose to a near-empty chamber and delivered a prepared speech without raising his voice and with no one around to interject. Later, the 7 1/2-minute speech went viral on YouTube, a hit with the young Green Left crowd, attracting 400,000 hits within a few days.

 

But forget the style of the speech; it merely disguised a message that was divisive, vindictive and in the end subversive.

 

“We want our country back,” he said, just six months after a federal election. This is a senator who, with his colleagues, holds the balance of power in the Senate on about 10 per cent of the vote.

 

Yet he told supporters they were somehow disenfranchised.

 

Ludlam spoke of “predator capitalism” and a “murderous horror unfolding on Manus Island” as he launched an attack on the Prime Minister and his government. He suggested Abbott treated WA as a “caricatured redneck backwater” and that it was “kind of revolting” that the Prime Minister consulted with “mining billionaires and media oligarchs on the other side of the world”.

 

Ludlam provided no serious evidence or justification for his slurs. He even talked about Abbott - who I first met 20 years ago through a mutual gay friend and who has been publicly loving and supportive of his gay sister - as “waving (his) homophobia in people’s faces”.

 

We know the Greens are a party of protest but this invective was simply hateful.

 

“Prime Minister,” said Ludlam, “you are welcome to take your heartless and racist exploitation of people’s fears and ram it as far from Western Australia as your taxpayer-funded travel entitlements can take you.”

 

So Ludlam used the Senate to denigrate a freshly elected Prime Minister who is implementing his agenda - to the extent that he isn't blocked by Ludlam’s party - as racist, cynically manipulative, heartless and exploitative.

On what evidence?

 

This vitriol is subversive because it suggests a democratic government has somehow stolen the country. If Ludlam and his supporters want their “country back” surely the way to do it is through fair-minded criticism and a viable alternative.

 

Message 1 of 265
Latest reply
264 REPLIES 264

Re: Unhinged Vitriolic Speech


@debra9275 wrote:

@silverfaun wrote:

No it's isn't if he stood in parliament and cast racist homophobic slurs on the PM of this country.

He stood up in parliament and cast these putrid slurs, he didn't dare say any of this outside of Parliamentary privilege.

 

It was a racist insulting speech and instead of looking at what he said people should look at what he stands for.

 

 


It wasn't a vitriolic speech silver, it was very honest and matter of fact

 

are you sure we're talking aboiut the same speech here??


silverfaun, the thread is about a speech isn't it? and how and where was this speech "racist",  "putrid slurs", "racist homophobic slurs" - where?

Message 101 of 265
Latest reply

Re: Unhinged Vitriolic Speech


@icyfroth wrote:

I just watched it to see what all the hullabaloo was about.

 

It was racist and homophobic and vitriol. Strangely delivered in rather an unenthusiastic and dispassionate manner by a rather anaemic looking man groomed to perfection, reading his speech off as if he'd seen it for the first time. Also he appeared to be speaking to no-one in particular.

It actually read better in Faun's OP than it was spoken, when I finally saw it on Bolt this morning, lol.

 

It did however have a kernel of truth in it, as Cassandra Wilkinson said on Bolt this morning, people of Australia do want to know why they're being priced out of affordable housing and losing their jobs to overseas manufacturing.

 

 


icyfroth,

 

Prob not what they want to hear on here though. Common sense and calling it for what it is is not what most on here got out of it.

 

They concentrated on the sickening Abbott bashing and racist slurs because that's what they want to hear.

Message 102 of 265
Latest reply

Re: Unhinged Vitriolic Speech


@icyfroth wrote:

I just watched it to see what all the hullabaloo was about.

 

It was racist and homophobic and vitriol. Strangely delivered in rather an unenthusiastic and dispassionate manner by a rather anaemic looking man groomed to perfection, reading his speech off as if he'd seen it for the first time. Also he appeared to be speaking to no-one in particular.

It actually read better in Faun's OP than it was spoken, when I finally saw it on Bolt this morning, lol.

 

It did however have a kernel of truth in it, as Cassandra Wilkinson said on Bolt this morning, people of Australia do want to know why they're being priced out of affordable housing and losing their jobs to overseas manufacturing.

 

 


Bolt played selected segments, not the speech.

The speech was in no way racist or homophobic.

 

It's interesting that while Labor and Labor and the Indies were in office Bolt's excuse for his vitriol was that he had to hold the government to account.  If that's the case why is he not interested in holding this government to account.  All his attacks are now on those in opposition. It's just an LNP advertorial.

 

 

Message 103 of 265
Latest reply

Re: Unhinged Vitriolic Speech

I'm sure the two panelists watched the whole speech and certainly didn't have to be spoon fed to see it for what it was. A despicable cowardly racist, homophobic slur on the serving PM of this country.

 

How come there's no outrage for this??  is it because he's not a woman and a Labor PM.? because there certainly would be plenty of outrage if she was slimed in such a manner,  and,  this was done on the Parliament floor no less, and yet the majority who have replied to this post support him and his actions show no distaste at all.

Message 104 of 265
Latest reply

Re: Unhinged Vitriolic Speech


@silverfaun wrote:

I'm sure the two panelists watched the whole speech and certainly didn't have to be spoon fed to see it for what it was. A despicable cowardly racist, homophobic slur on the serving PM of this country.

 

How come there's no outrage for this??  is it because he's not a woman and a Labor PM.? because there certainly would be plenty of outrage if she was slimed in such a manner,  and,  this was done on the Parliament floor no less, and yet the majority who have replied to this post support him and his actions show no distaste at all.


Well if it was as you insist - a  "racist, homophobic slur", I  wait with interest for when he is charged with making a "hate speech", then I am sure the likes of bolt will be out protesting against the right of  "freedom of speech" - can't wait.

Message 105 of 265
Latest reply

Re: Unhinged Vitriolic Speech

Yes, the "thanks" said it all.
.
Message 106 of 265
Latest reply

Re: Unhinged Vitriolic Speech

I'd hate to see the outrage such a speech would've engendered if it was aimed at Ms Gillard, for example.

Message 107 of 265
Latest reply

Re: Unhinged Vitriolic Speech

there was no gender bias or quiet chauvinism. where did he attack abbott on his gender ? where was the degrading witch sign ?

Message 108 of 265
Latest reply

Re: Unhinged Vitriolic Speech

Yes so would I.

The thing is, such a speech would never be aired at Julia Gillard because she's not racist or homophobic, nor did she rely on shallow three word slogans. She wasnt a politician who sacrificed the betterment of a nation by killing jobs, the environment and our way of life, simply to support a mystical & false ideology that helping billionaires get richer will result in a stronger economy. We all know it won't. Billionaires who get richer simply ship the money out. Australian corporate culture does not include social responsibility.

She did, however, have to put up with death threats, misogyny, crude signs and filthy cartoons. I didn't notice any outrage from you about that.
.
Message 109 of 265
Latest reply

Re: Unhinged Vitriolic Speech


@just_me_karen wrote:
Yes so would I.

The thing is, such a speech would never be aired at Julia Gillard because she's not racist or homophobic, nor did she rely on shallow three word slogans. She wasnt a politician who sacrificed the betterment of a nation by killing jobs, the environment and our way of life, simply to support a mystical & false ideology that helping billionaires get richer will result in a stronger economy. We all know it won't. Billionaires who get richer simply ship the money out. Australian corporate culture does not include social responsibility.

She did, however, have to put up with death threats, misogyny, crude signs and filthy cartoons. I didn't notice any outrage from you about that.

"She did, however, have to put up with death threats, misogyny, crude signs and filthy cartoons. I didn't notice any outrage from you about that."

 

Nor would you have Karen, as I was very admiring of her misogyny speech at the time and said so, if you cast your mind back.

Message 110 of 265
Latest reply