What are your thoughts....

[*pepe]

Say you were accused of something you hadn't done and suffered some ramifications for it and you message the accuser letting them know they were wrong and asking why they thought you had done this deed - the accuser reads the message but totally disregards it - neither acknowledges they received the message nor that they were wrong.

What would you think?  Would you think they are rude or that they are just to weak to admit their mistake or some other conclusion?

I'm after opinions....

[*pepe]

---

@opmania wrote:

Sometimes you just have to let things go and 

Move on because some people really don't

Warrant worrying about

---

my question wasn't if it was worth worrying about, it was asking for opinions on the lack of response.

[youcandoityoucandoityoucandoit]

They might be embarrassed to admit they were wrong, or they might be in denial, or maybe they havent received the message yet....

[latina4621 · Accepted solution]

I think they are weak.,   and maybe they  don't won't to admit they are wrong  because they actually like all the trouble it caused

[opmania]

Why dont you send them another

Message maybe they didn't

Receive the first one.

Messages sometimes go

Astray

[moonflyte]

If you are talking about a certain company hired to mediate then I wouldnt waste my time waiting.

[imastawka · Accepted solution]

---

@*pepe wrote:

Say you were accused of something you hadn't done and suffered some ramifications for it and you message the accuser letting them know they were wrong and asking why they thought you had done this deed - the accuser reads the message but totally disregards it - neither acknowledges they received the message nor that they were wrong.

What would you think?  Would you think they are rude or that they are just to weak to admit their mistake or some other conclusion?

I'm after opinions....

---

 I would think that they are too self-centred to entertain the very notion of replying

I would think they do not believe your protestations, and believe they are on the

higher moral ground,  albeit incorrectly.

Howzat?

[chuk_77]

---

@*pepe wrote:

Say you were accused of something you hadn't done and suffered some ramifications for it and you message the accuser letting them know they were wrong and asking why they thought you had done this deed - the accuser reads the message but totally disregards it - neither acknowledges they received the message nor that they were wrong.

What would you think?  Would you think they are rude or that they are just to weak to admit their mistake or some other conclusion?

I'm after opinions....

---

if you are going to be accused of something, the accuser should provide proof at the time of the acusation, not just accept that the accusee will go along with whatever ramifications take place. 

[*pepe]

---

@imastawka wrote:

---

@*pepe wrote:

Say you were accused of something you hadn't done and suffered some ramifications for it and you message the accuser letting them know they were wrong and asking why they thought you had done this deed - the accuser reads the message but totally disregards it - neither acknowledges they received the message nor that they were wrong.

What would you think?  Would you think they are rude or that they are just to weak to admit their mistake or some other conclusion?

I'm after opinions....

---

 I would think that they are too self-centred to entertain the very notion of replying

I would think they do not believe your protestations, and believe they are on the

higher moral ground,  albeit incorrectly.

Howzat?

---

you get a green tick too.

[imastawka]

    Yay me          (Wish I knew what that was all about)

[latina4621 · Accepted solution]

I would like to add embarrassed or not it is a pretty low thing to do  not own up to a mistake ecspecially when someone else has copped ramifications over it

in future i would be giving them a wide birth.