on โ25-10-2015 07:52 PM
Say you were accused of something you hadn't done and suffered some ramifications for it and you message the accuser letting them know they were wrong and asking why they thought you had done this deed - the accuser reads the message but totally disregards it - neither acknowledges they received the message nor that they were wrong.
What would you think? Would you think they are rude or that they are just to weak to admit their mistake or some other conclusion?
I'm after opinions....
Solved! Go to Solution.
on โ25-10-2015 08:52 PM
on โ25-10-2015 08:54 PM
They might be embarrassed to admit they were wrong, or they might be in denial, or maybe they havent received the message yet....
on โ25-10-2015 09:14 PM
I think they are weak., and maybe they don't won't to admit they are wrong because they actually like all the trouble it caused
on โ25-10-2015 09:25 PM
Why dont you send them another
Message maybe they didn't
Receive the first one.
Messages sometimes go
Astray
on โ25-10-2015 09:49 PM
If you are talking about a certain company hired to mediate then I wouldnt waste my time waiting.
on โ25-10-2015 09:54 PM
@*pepe wrote:Say you were accused of something you hadn't done and suffered some ramifications for it and you message the accuser letting them know they were wrong and asking why they thought you had done this deed - the accuser reads the message but totally disregards it - neither acknowledges they received the message nor that they were wrong.
What would you think? Would you think they are rude or that they are just to weak to admit their mistake or some other conclusion?
I'm after opinions....
I would think that they are too self-centred to entertain the very notion of replying
I would think they do not believe your protestations, and believe they are on the
higher moral ground, albeit incorrectly.
Howzat?
on โ25-10-2015 10:39 PM
@*pepe wrote:Say you were accused of something you hadn't done and suffered some ramifications for it and you message the accuser letting them know they were wrong and asking why they thought you had done this deed - the accuser reads the message but totally disregards it - neither acknowledges they received the message nor that they were wrong.
What would you think? Would you think they are rude or that they are just to weak to admit their mistake or some other conclusion?
I'm after opinions....
if you are going to be accused of something, the accuser should provide proof at the time of the acusation, not just accept that the accusee will go along with whatever ramifications take place.
on โ25-10-2015 10:44 PM
@imastawka wrote:
@*pepe wrote:Say you were accused of something you hadn't done and suffered some ramifications for it and you message the accuser letting them know they were wrong and asking why they thought you had done this deed - the accuser reads the message but totally disregards it - neither acknowledges they received the message nor that they were wrong.
What would you think? Would you think they are rude or that they are just to weak to admit their mistake or some other conclusion?
I'm after opinions....
I would think that they are too self-centred to entertain the very notion of replying
I would think they do not believe your protestations, and believe they are on the
higher moral ground, albeit incorrectly.
Howzat?
you get a green tick too.
on โ25-10-2015 10:51 PM
Yay me (Wish I knew what that was all about)
on โ26-10-2015 09:29 PM
I would like to add embarrassed or not it is a pretty low thing to do not own up to a mistake ecspecially when someone else has copped ramifications over it
in future i would be giving them a wide birth.