on 07-07-2016 02:29 PM
who agrees?? 6 years with possibly only 3 years........ i was horrified and i watched the whole trial
on 07-07-2016 04:07 PM
@kopenhagen5 wrote:I thought he would get minimum 15 years.
However it is what you can prove, not what appears or seems probable.
And lets just for a minute think...........................
................................what if he really thought he was shooting someone else and not the girl he loved.....................
Then he has gone through hell.
and what if he didn't?
on 07-07-2016 04:28 PM
on 07-07-2016 04:36 PM
I think he is going to be very poorly treated inside
One can only hope
on 07-07-2016 04:49 PM
The judge was trained in Australia. You can understand the light sentence.
on 07-07-2016 05:00 PM
@village_person wrote:The judge was trained in Australia. You can understand the light sentence.
Could you please provide some evidence of that?
on 07-07-2016 05:26 PM
@village_person wrote:The judge was trained in Australia. You can understand the light sentence.
no she wasn't.
07-07-2016 05:32 PM - edited 07-07-2016 05:33 PM
The judge was trained in Australia
I think the tongue was firmly planted in the cheek with that statement
on 07-07-2016 05:34 PM
@village_person wrote:The judge was trained in Australia. You can understand the light sentence.
Not even close
on 07-07-2016 05:49 PM
Will it include time served?
on 07-07-2016 05:58 PM
Prosecution has 14 days to appeal the light sentence.
It will then be heard by a panel of judges.
The defence team can also appeal