30-08-2018 03:36 PM - edited 30-08-2018 03:37 PM
I think I once posted that it was unfair to block new buyers as a whole, because of the bad behaviour of a few. Well guess what? I’ll eat my words, and yes, you warned me. No more bidding from buyers with zero against their names for us. When you have a few in a row and you need to wait eight days before you can make that second chance offer, not only does it hold up the works, but it invariably costs you the sale to the under-bidder too.
A few countries are going to get the big flick as well.
No wonder some sellers become a bit ‘over it’ all. You do your best to do what you know is right, but according to ‘him’ and I’m starting to believe he’s right, ‘Too Many grubs in the garden’. I don’t like calling people grubs. There’s a certain nasty tone to it, but there’s certainly plenty out there with grubby behaviour.
A bit cross today. It’ll be wine o’clock early .... and ‘He’ had better not say, ‘I told you so’. Lol.
Melina.
on 31-08-2018 11:24 AM
It is probably worthwhile checking the number of potential buyers you are blocking every now and again if you do go ahead with the new requirements. You can see who is blocked in the Buyer Requirements Activity Log, it lists who was blocked and why.
Site Preferences >>> Buyer requirements >>> Buyer Requirements Activity Log
Also remember as Christmas approaches you can expect more new buyers looking for presents. Its a fine balacing act between lost sales and non-payer inconvenience.
on 31-08-2018 11:39 AM