on โ20-03-2016 11:54 AM
on โ20-03-2016 12:07 PM
I can see the product details clearly in each, the background is good, but in terms of the contrast between background and logo, picture two is the best.
I can read the logo clearly. In pics 1 and 3, I can't read it all.
โ20-03-2016 01:24 PM - edited โ20-03-2016 01:24 PM
@erg-auto-electrical-wholesalers wrote:
Pictures look good mate, we can't see some of the other responders pictures because they choose to hide behind a secret i.d
on โ20-03-2016 01:44 PM
Ok you mean logo as in watermark?
it is the ebay generated one.
โ20-03-2016 02:25 PM - edited โ20-03-2016 02:28 PM
The first 2 are fine (except for depth of field isssues) but you haven't handled the reflection problem in shot #3 (rear).
You should have a look at getting yourself a large light tent and 2 or 3 continuous lights with stands to address this.
As for the depth of field issue, use a smaller f stop (f8, f11 or f16) and a longer exposure time (I assume you have a tripod)
Apart from that, the watermark cannot be easily read in any of the shots and is also incomplete (ditch the "whol" and choose a better stroke and fill).
on โ20-03-2016 02:35 PM
As I mentioned to you before - ebay now require either MPN or UPC's for items listed on ebay. You will need to provide that information otherwise when you GTC listings are due to be automatically relisted by ebay they won't be relisted - they will be removed from ebay and sent to your unsold items folder.
on โ20-03-2016 05:34 PM
@smelly_bum_bum wrote:Ok you mean logo as in watermark?
it is the ebay generated one.
OK. Yes, that is what I meant. It's not showing up well except the one pic. Too close to background colour.