@davidc4430 wrote:
self correction
its 9 out of 10 people who have been tested who are not going home and isolating until they get cleared
it was written as 9 out of 10 so it read like out of all victorians
still, 9 out of 10 tested not doing the right things still bad
had i known what i know now id have seeked my test sooner
david, careful now, wouldnโt want you to fall over while backtracking.
It isnโt even this:
@david wrote: โits 9 out of 10 people who have been tested who are not going home and isolating until they get clearedโ
What the article that you linked to says is actually:
"Fifty-three per cent of people continuing to do their shopping, continuing to go to work continuing to do all sorts of things," he said.
Dont get me wrong, there is no excuse for not isolating while awaiting test results, BUT there is a big difference between 90% and 53% and a HUGE difference between any % of those tested and all Victorians which is how your post came across.
What it looks like (to me) is that in your haste to rubbish Victoria and Dan Andrews you saw what your posting predilection wanted to see in the linked article and then came here shooting your mouth off:
Coronavirus cases in Victoria have hit a record high with 484 new cases reported in the last 24 hours, as new figures reveal almost 90 per cent of people are failing to self-isolate when they become unwell.
and
He said he was "very unhappy and very sad" to report that nearly nine in 10 people did not isolate between the time they first felt sick and when they went to get a test.
The devil is in the detail. How about a real apology for your post?
