3BrNBBRz4UYdo+!~~60_7.JPG "chameleon54"){kind=avatar}
@go-tazz wrote:
@chameleon54 wrote:seems like the S.A. government has taken your advice david. Some bakers allowed to open
No.
It means wholesale bakeries can now operate โ but only if they do not see, supply or sell on a retail basis to members of the public.
No News stories on the internet yet, but the premier has just announced relaxation of restrictions on exercise.
Not yet.
The government faced a backlash from some in the community after the directions banned any exercise in public, including taking pets for walks.
โExercise will be the first restriction that we will remove,โ Mr Marshall said.
โWe just still need some more time with the stay-at-home rules.โ
Its nice to live in a state where a government is listening to its constituents and is willing to change things when possible, rather than simply dogedly holding onto questionable policy just to save face.
Maybe try reading the actual link before posting false information and giving people false hope.
And your continual attacks on Vic and Dan are getting and bit monotonous and obviously politically motivated
whilst obviously the SA government can't do anything wrong but that's mainly due to lessons learned from
other states and countries that have gone through it on a larger scale yet you try and make it sound like SA came
up with it.
Vic didn't rule the exercise out because it was a necessary part of getting through the lockdown so why did SA?
It's always easier to control something on a smaller scale then something more than four times that size.
No need for the head banging Tazz, I,ve been saying EXACTLY the same thing for many months. Its just that you and others have chosen to ignore any comments I make which don't align with your very obvious bias.
Example - This cut and paste from post 2406 on this thread.
There's no doubt that containing the virus in Victoria was always going to be much harder than in South Australia, regardless of who was in charge.
Reasons include, Melbourne airport being an international gateway to Australia, much higher migrant populations in Victoria who may not always be proficient in speaking and reading English ( and may not trust government officials and health advice to the same extent as those born here. ) Melbourne ports are also a major freight gateway and the major transport and manufacturing distribution centres have people coming and going from all areas in the country with inherent poor monitoring of driver health status.
If that's not fair, rational conversation, I don't know what is. If other posters on these forums showed as much balance in their posts, we could have much more intelligent discussions rather than the one eyed partisan at all costs rants we seem to be seeing from a few at the moment. Very relevant to stawks last post too I think..
@imastawka wrote:
@chameleon54 wrote:seems like the S.A. government has taken your advice david. Some bakers allowed to open
No News stories on the internet yet, but the premier has just announced relaxation of restrictions on exercise.
Its nice to live in a state where a government is listening to its constituents and is willing to change things when possible, rather than simply dogedly holding onto questionable policy just to save face.
You better hope and pray that statement doesn't come back to bite your rrrse.
I think re-opening too soon is a mistake.
But then, we Vics make the mistakes, don't we?
SA can do no wrong.
Tired of the continuous bagging, Chameleon.
Give it a rest
There's a small group here who seem to think only their view of the world should be discussed and anyone who holds a different opinion should not be allowed to express it.
Its been noted many times before by the special little group, but here's a reminder for you Stawka, This is a public forum and anyone is entitled to express whatever views they please within the boundaries of board policy.
You may feel challenged and uncomfortable by this, you may disagree and take part in " pile ons " to try to stifle alternate views and discussion, but you cant decide who can and cant post here and you don't get to decide what views are expressed here.
@chameleon54 wrote:
@imastawka wrote:
@chameleon54 wrote:seems like the S.A. government has taken your advice david. Some bakers allowed to open
No News stories on the internet yet, but the premier has just announced relaxation of restrictions on exercise.
Its nice to live in a state where a government is listening to its constituents and is willing to change things when possible, rather than simply dogedly holding onto questionable policy just to save face.
You better hope and pray that statement doesn't come back to bite your rrrse.
I think re-opening too soon is a mistake.
But then, we Vics make the mistakes, don't we?
SA can do no wrong.
Tired of the continuous bagging, Chameleon.
Give it a rest
There's a small group here who seem to think only their view of the world should be discussed and anyone who holds a different opinion should not be allowed to express it.
Not at all true - the overuse of the word BIAS - is a bit one sided.
Its been noted many times before by the special little group, but here's a reminder for you Stawka, This is a public forum and anyone is entitled to express whatever views they please within the boundaries of board policy.
Out of the mouths of babes - all have an opinion & are able to express it.
You may feel challenged and uncomfortable by this, you may disagree and take part in " pile ons " to try to stifle alternate views and discussion, but you cant decide who can and cant post here and you don't get to decide what views are expressed here.
Are ' pile-ons ' - simply a - more than one disagreeing.
Seems your idea of individual disapproval - is only a ' pile-on ' when you are not agreed with.
@domino-710 wrote:
@chameleon54 wrote:
@imastawka wrote:
@chameleon54 wrote:seems like the S.A. government has taken your advice david. Some bakers allowed to open
No News stories on the internet yet, but the premier has just announced relaxation of restrictions on exercise.
Its nice to live in a state where a government is listening to its constituents and is willing to change things when possible, rather than simply dogedly holding onto questionable policy just to save face.
You better hope and pray that statement doesn't come back to bite your rrrse.
I think re-opening too soon is a mistake.
But then, we Vics make the mistakes, don't we?
SA can do no wrong.
Tired of the continuous bagging, Chameleon.
Give it a rest
There's a small group here who seem to think only their view of the world should be discussed and anyone who holds a different opinion should not be allowed to express it.
Not at all true - the overuse of the word BIAS - is a bit one sided.
Its been noted many times before by the special little group, but here's a reminder for you Stawka, This is a public forum and anyone is entitled to express whatever views they please within the boundaries of board policy.
Out of the mouths of babes - all have an opinion & are able to express it.
You may feel challenged and uncomfortable by this, you may disagree and take part in " pile ons " to try to stifle alternate views and discussion, but you cant decide who can and cant post here and you don't get to decide what views are expressed here.
Are ' pile-ons ' - simply a - more than one disagreeing.
Seems your idea of individual disapproval - is only a ' pile-on ' when you are not agreed with.
I think people can and will make up their own minds on this one.......
@chameleon54 wrote:No need for the head banging Tazz, I,ve been saying EXACTLY the same thing for many months. Its just that you and others have chosen to ignore any comments I make which don't align with your very obvious bias.
Example - This cut and paste from post 2406 on this thread.
There's no doubt that containing the virus in Victoria was always going to be much harder than in South Australia, regardless of who was in charge.
Reasons include, Melbourne airport being an international gateway to Australia, much higher migrant populations in Victoria who may not always be proficient in speaking and reading English ( and may not trust government officials and health advice to the same extent as those born here. ) Melbourne ports are also a major freight gateway and the major transport and manufacturing distribution centres have people coming and going from all areas in the country with inherent poor monitoring of driver health status.
If that's not fair, rational conversation, I don't know what is. If other posters on these forums showed as much balance in their posts, we could have much more intelligent discussions rather than the one eyed partisan at all costs rants we seem to be seeing from a few at the moment. Very relevant to stawks last post too I think..
One post excuses your diatribe?
Your other posts are the complete opposite to that.
You have continually bagged Vic and Dan in post after post so NO the above is just generic as you have put every
Victorian offside due to your comments time and time again.
Mistakes are always going to be made and no one is excempt from that but your rant against Vic and Dan went to
the next level and started to sound like a political platform to stop him getting elected next term.
Hopefully it's brought under control quickly in SA as I have five brothers and two sisters over there but to
continually bag Vic has to stop.
It's bad enough with the footy but over this it's just totally wrong.
@eol-products wrote:Have you ever tried fixing a water leak with bread?
No, but fruitcake works, as long as you understand you'll have to replace the pipe when it goes stale. 
