Do you think Gay Marriage leads to

[donnashuggy]

Beast....iality

How embarrassing for the Liberal Party.  😄

Does anyone actually agree with Bernadi?

[nero_bolt]

shuggs I agree with you..... thats twice in a  month, must be something in the water but lets try and not make a habit of it otherwise people may talk.   🙂

How embarrassing for the Liberal Party.  

very but thank goodness he will be but a back bencher and have no say in policy

Does anyone actually agree with Bernadi?

not me or the majority in the LNP but then every part needs at least one nutter and he is the LNP's 

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/tony-abbotts-sister-christine-forster-speaks-out-against-cory-bernardi/story-fn59niix-1226665779325

'

he is a worry but then there is a Polyamory Action Group in Australia,,,,, I didnt know that

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/opinion/maverick-senator-cory-bernardi8217s-worst-fears-about-polygamy-being-realised/story-fnh4jt63-1226665640545

Now that you have also opened up  one of your one line lobs I am sure that all the usual will come out of the wood work to offer their learned opinions

[kengillard]

what nonsense!!!

[*crikey*mate*]

I think that's kind of up there with a Brazilian leading to the peter files.

[lakeland27]

'Dozens of people - 25, to be precise - have signed a petition for the "full recognition of polyamorous families".

that proves him right ?

apart from that (and warebuns assertion 'he's a backbencher;) means this guy is powerless ? he controls the ultra-right 'no climate change, no g marriage no nothing' faction of the party.

he's only a backbencher til after the election, when his faction seeks its pay day..

[poddster]

Nope, but that type of union is just as fruitless as far as procreation is concerned

[lakeland27]

Nope, but that type of union is just as fruitless as far as procreation is concerned

what on earth does that silly comment mean exactly ? you agree with cory do you ? why am i unsurprised ? :^O

[poddster]

Not at all LL if you actually read, absorb and comprehend what I have posted you would understand, but as you have not I will spell it out for you.

Human/animal relationships do nor produce ofspring and neither do male/male or female/female ones but the latter two do not lead to human/animal relationships. is that clearer?

[poddster]

....but then every party needs at least one nutter

There are some parties that need at least one sane member.

I can think of several like that 🙂

[donnashuggy]

Is he a close friend of Tony Abbott?