on 21-04-2014 11:16 AM
on 24-04-2014 06:09 AM
"Only those fossilized bones with butchery marks can confidently be tied to hominin diet (Blumenschine & Pobiner 2006). The earliest well-accepted evidence for this novel dietary behavior comes from about 2.6 Ma at the site of Gona, Ethiopia (Domínguez-Rodrigo et al. 2005). Probably not coincidentally, it's also around this time that we start to see the first evidence of archaeologically visible accumulations of stone tools (Semaw et al.2003). There may be evidence of hominin-butchered bones at 3.4 Ma at Dikika, Ethiopia (McPherron et al. 2010), where Australopithecus afarensisremains have been found, but this evidence consists of only a few bone specimens and has been disputed (Domínguez-Rodrigo et al. 2010). The earliest well documented evidence of persistent hominin carnivory from in situ excavated fossil fauna occurring in association with large concentrations of stone tools is at about 2.0 Ma at Kanjera, Kenya (Ferraro et al. 2013). In addition to terrestrial animals, evidence from one site at Koobi Fora shows that hominins began to incorporate aquatic foods like turtles, crocodiles, and fish into their diets by about 1.95 Ma (Braun et al.2010). Multiple localities at Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania, dating to 1.8 Ma also show evidence of in situ butchered mammal remains, ranging in size from hedgehogs to elephants; these are also associated with large numbers of stone tools (Domínguez-Rodrigo et al. 2007; Blumenschine & Pobiner 2006 and references therein). Three sites at Koobi Fora, Kenya, preserve evidence of several butchered mammals from about 1.5 Ma but are not found in association with any stone tools (Pobiner et al. 2008). Perhaps this signals a shift toward intentional specialization of activities, such as animal butchery and stone tool making, in different areas across the landscape. "
http://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/evidence-for-meat-eating-by-early-humans-103874273
on 24-04-2014 08:39 AM
We are not descended from these hominids. These are species that have become extinct, such as the Neanderthals, though at times I'm sure I see throwbacks in modern society.................. *giggle*.
We are of the species Homo Sapiens. Not designed to eat meat, even though we can. We cannot however thrive on an exclusively meat diet but must include large amounts of vegetable and fruit matter to maintain good health.
In case you missed it first time:
Are human beings anatomically more similar to natural carnivores or to natural herbivores? Let’s find out….
But aren’t humans anatomically suited to be omnivores?
Nope. We don’t anatomically match up with omnivorous animals anymore than we do with carnivorous ones. Omnivores are more similar to carnivores than they are to herbivores. For a more detailed summary table that compares the properties of carnivores, herbivores, and omnivores side by side, see this page:
Comparative Anatomy & Taxonomy
The link above also debunks the opportunistic feeder theory, which states that because humans can eat like omnivores, that we must therefore be omnivores. And this is of course false because mere behavior doesn’t indicate suitability. There are plenty of things we can do as a species that would threaten our survival if we all considered them suitable default behavior, such as shooting each other, lobbing hand grenades, or sending spam.
on 24-04-2014 02:15 PM
Homo is the genus of hominids that includes modern humans and species closely related to them.
Guess we are related to them.
If herbivores cannot chew or digest meat.......humans are not herbivores.
Early to modern humans have been eating meat for around 2.6 million years..... we digest it just fine....lol.
It is strange that you relate to ruminants...giggle....
on 24-04-2014 02:21 PM
"An omnivore is an organism that regularly consumes a variety of material, including plants, animals, algae, andfungi. They range in
size from tiny insects like ants to large creatures—like people. Human beings are omnivores. People eat plants, such as vegetables
and fruits. We eat animals, cooked as meat or used for products like milk or eggs. We eat fungi such as mushrooms. We also eat algae,
in the form of edibleseaweeds such as nori, which are used to wrap sushi rolls, and sea lettuce, eaten in salads. Bears are omnivores,
too. They eat plants like berries as well as mushroom fungi and animals like salmon or deer.
http://education.nationalgeographic.com/education/encyclopedia/omnivore/?ar_a=1
National Geographic certainly believe that humans are omnivores.......not herbivores.......
on 24-04-2014 02:34 PM
ref. siggs promoting/touting The National Geographic Mag as being gospel on anything/everything.....
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................
National Geographic have been known to promote unprovable theories as the truth......... is this practice considered an outright lie?
.............i would not believe everything they state as being 'true' *giggle*
on 24-04-2014 08:19 PM
i find it amazing that things which have been facts for a long time now are discussed here as if no one really knows what it is yet.
it's like discussing if water is wet or not at 20 degree celsius.
on 24-04-2014 08:41 PM
on 24-04-2014 09:23 PM
@siggie-reported-by-alarmists wrote:As humans are Omnivores.......we actually have more in common with carnivores than herbivores...........
Early humans were eating meat over a million years ago and possibly as far back as 2.6 million years go.
Yeah but they died out.
on 25-04-2014 01:30 AM
How can such an inane, shallow question generate so many responses? The questioner is experimenting with you for his pleasure.
25-04-2014 01:40 AM - edited 25-04-2014 01:41 AM
And........
This upsets you, why?