on 17-05-2015 10:19 PM
Surely not! After 10 months!! Is that all Reeva was worth?
He is now waiting for the South African prison authorities to decide whether to grant him conditional release, possibly from August.
I hope they listen to Reeva's mum and keep him in for the full 5 years.
He should have gotten more
on 13-06-2015 05:46 PM
it IS wrong
he should do his time properly - the whole five years
on 13-06-2015 05:51 PM
there is no evidence whatsoever anyone else could have killed Reeva so it doesn't take rocket science to know he was as guilty as what the jury found him
13-06-2015 06:44 PM - edited 13-06-2015 06:47 PM
Convicted killers are found not guilty years later (and released) electric*mayhem*band.
New Zealander David Bain was 23yrs old when he was found guilty of killing his Mum, Dad & three siblings - regardless of the fact that at the time of killings, he was seen doing his paper-run
Fortunately, but not sooner because I never believed David was guilty, he had served only 13½ years of a life sentence (but still far to much for an innocent man) before successfully appealing his original convictions to the the British Privy Council, May2007. Finding there had been a substantial miscarriage of justice (I can think of more appropriate termology, albeit not polite), the Privy Council quashed David's convictions and ordered a retrial. The second trial held in Christchurch ended with his acquittal on all charges in June 2009.
NZ's justice system is as defunct as Sth Africa's justice system appears to be
on 14-06-2015 04:29 AM
@rebelcr wrote:Convicted killers are found not guilty years later (and released) electric*mayhem*band.
New Zealander David Bain was 23yrs old when he was found guilty of killing his Mum, Dad & three siblings - regardless of the fact that at the time of killings, he was seen doing his paper-run
Fortunately, but not sooner because I never believed David was guilty, he had served only 13½ years of a life sentence (but still far to much for an innocent man) before successfully appealing his original convictions to the the British Privy Council, May2007. Finding there had been a substantial miscarriage of justice (I can think of more appropriate termology, albeit not polite), the Privy Council quashed David's convictions and ordered a retrial. The second trial held in Christchurch ended with his acquittal on all charges in June 2009.
NZ's justice system is as defunct as Sth Africa's justice system appears to be
And the point of this diatribe is what exactly ? People are well aware that there are some who are wrongly convicted. Some even lose their life at the end of a rope, in the electric chair, or by lethal injection. I can think of at least three people off the top of my head from the UK alone, who were executed (hung), and later found to be innocent. Timothy Evans, Derek Bentley, and Hussein Mattan.
In Pistorius's case, he actually admitted it, so I fail to see why you have highlighted my ID alongside the phrase above. What precisely are you attempting to convey, because the reason for this insertion has gone completely over my head ?
on 14-06-2015 09:16 AM
had you said Pistorious admitted he did kill Reeva before you dissed Jessicadazzler 'Are you for real ? If he didn't do, who did ? The Mad Hatter ?', I wouldn't have given an example.
on 14-06-2015 10:27 AM
You are making no sense whatsoever. There was never any suggestion from anyone that Pistorious wasn't guilty, that goes without saying....which is why I didn't feel the need to mention it initially, and only did so because of your stupid and pedantic reply.
Do come in out of the rain.
14-06-2015 11:23 AM - edited 14-06-2015 11:28 AM
@rebelcr wrote:had you said Pistorious admitted he did kill Reeva before you dissed Jessicadazzler 'Are you for real ? If he didn't do, who did ? The Mad Hatter ?', I wouldn't have given an example.
If you don't know the case, why comment at all?
Pistorius killed her in cold blood, admitted it, and now is being freed
after 10 months. That's the case in a nutshell!
Reeva deserves justice. Her life has been deemed wothless by the rich,
and the corrupt legal system in South Africa
14-06-2015 12:04 PM - edited 14-06-2015 12:04 PM
there is no evidence whatsoever anyone else could have killed Reeva so it doesn't take rocket science to know he was as guilty as what the jury found him
14-06-2015 12:08 PM - edited 14-06-2015 12:09 PM
@rebelcr wrote:had you said Pistorious admitted he did kill Reeva before you dissed Jessicadazzler 'Are you for real ? If he didn't do, who did ? The Mad Hatter ?', I wouldn't have given an example.
Ok.... It was Jessicadazzler who FIRST mentioned that Pistorius wasnt proven 100% guilty. post 19 i think... (crone memory)
Then electric Mayhem replied with : 'Are you for real ? If he didn't do, who did ? The Mad Hatter ?'
Then you responed with an example of those who were convicted wrongly.
Now thats thats all cleared up..... I want to ask you *rebelcr* ... do YOU think PISTORIUS is INNOCENT of Reeva's death?
14-06-2015 12:17 PM - edited 14-06-2015 12:19 PM
Pistorius is as innocent of Revea's death as Stalin is as guilty of the thousands he killed, so no Pistorius knowingly killed Reeva.