on 08-09-2014 01:44 PM
on 10-09-2014 08:49 AM
Some parents of lower socio economic means save hard and make sacrifices to send their children to the school of their choice, private or public. You will find all levels of children in all schools.
on 10-09-2014 11:17 AM
on 10-09-2014 11:25 AM
on 10-09-2014 11:26 AM
lol, well, he has been badly misinformed, hasn't he?
I think shared custody might have different criteria.
Personally, unless abuse is involved, or neglect, shared custody is the best thing for most children.
If neither can afford the school, how would they pay for it?
on 10-09-2014 11:31 AM
on 10-09-2014 11:49 AM
@grandmoon wrote:
With shared custody both parents are expected to reside within the same school catchment area. Or very close.
Still irrelevant if they cant pay for the school.
And if he wont shift back, is he expecting her to shift closer?
I think she is making a mountain out of a molehill, nobdy can make her pay for a school with money she doesnt have and nobody can make her shift to suit them. Tell her to stop worrying about it.
on 10-09-2014 01:05 PM
@*elizabeths-mum* wrote:
I read something recently, no idea where sorry, that child support was being/had been changed a little so a non custodial parent paying the support has more say in how it is spent. I think that was to ensure the money was used for the child though.
I'm so glad my grandchildren have grown up. Their self-employed father had no
income 'on the books' and was graciously paying the minimum of $26 per month
for three kids!! And they would let those types have a say in how it was spent?