why do atheists feel the need to talk about God all the time?

[best.buys]

see you have to comment

don't you

you know you want to write something

you just have to comment

resistance is futile

[best.buys]

if you have ever seen dawkins debate a creationist he spends most of the time in mocking answers and personal attacks.

[**meep**]

meep not sure who your post is for but Dawkins spends a lot of his time campaigning against something he believes doesn't exists. kind of a sad life if you think about it.

the images I posted were following my comment re the arrogance of some atheists ie "You KNOW its a Myth, this Season Celebrate Reason!"

[para-sights]

If you want to teach science to all that's OK. If you want to balance that out with religion that's okay too. I personal choose evolution...

[**meep**]

if you have ever seen dawkins debate a creationist he spends most of the time in mocking answers and personal attacks.

Yes, I have seen him debating.  Have read transcript of his debate with Rowan Williams, i think it was... That was interesting 😄

[para-sights]

As an evolutionist I also dislike Dawkins. I read the God Delusion and thought it was a very basic argument and I also think he is a bit of a arrogant "rottweiler" but my life as evolution still stands.

[best.buys]

thankyou, meep and para for rationale intelligent answers. not used to it on here.

[the_great_she_elephant]

ellie, Darwin was in a long line of philosopher/thinkers going way back in history.

He may have been and it was certainly his Victorian Christian upbringing and way of thinking that led him to believe in the racial inferiority of "The children of Ham."

This belief didn't come to him as a sudden revelation when  he discovered the secret of evolution though, it was already well and truly established in his psyche.

He may well have assumed that evolution provided proof of this preconceived idea, but if so then further studies have certainly shown him to be wrong in that particular conclusin. AND THAT IS WHAT SCIENCE IS ALL ABOUT.

[best.buys]

ellie, it goes back to the Greeks [possibly further back], bible wasn't around then. Darwin copied from many others, he became the "one" because he was the first to have it printed.

[best.buys]

the racial inferiority of the children of Ham is not scriptural [we are all created in the image of God]. it is used by racists [probably after reading Darwins book] to justify slavery.

[lakeland27]

dawkins doesn't speak for most people. its absurd to say not following a religion is a religion.

 how can indifference be a spritual incentive, it makes no sense.