on 13-10-2012 06:30 AM
Hi all I was wondering why eBay doesn't allow people to sell replica items such as Louis Vuitton, or Chanel if it is listed as replica in the description. I have seen people listing replica Louis Vuitton as LV rather than "Louis Vuitton" and starting bids at $20 rather than $200 however when I tried to list one of mine my listing was removed for a violation of the rules! I know who the member is who reported my listing so why isn't this member doing the same for every replica item on eBay?
Please help me understand this ruling and advise me on how to deal with this member. I had in no way attempted to mislead any buyers in believing my handbag was real!
on 10-01-2018 01:30 PM
just saying what the law is
10-01-2018 01:59 PM - edited 10-01-2018 02:01 PM
@iloveelena03-7 wrote:just saying what the law is
The law states you can not use any part of a trademark under copyright and Jackson is a trademark which you
are not allowed to use to promote your items.
eBay can remove any listing that contravenes that policy or any other policy that you agreed to when you
signed up.
on 10-01-2018 02:01 PM
ebay will let anyone sell anything until someone complains, it's onmly after someone complains ebay will remove because they make money from every sale
on 10-01-2018 02:55 PM
I just read few bits of info re fakes - and few are not accurate.
Buying of fake item, at the markets, from Ebay, from overseas.... etc - will not get you prosecuted. Can you imagine how many people on any given day would be carted off by the police and charged for carying those awflul fake LV bags? And that's just from one shopping centre! Multiply for nation wide.
I spoke to someone from LV some time time ago, and that subject came up - and you'd need to be found manufacturing and distributing them before they would lay charges.
Likewise, saying it's illegal to post them is meaningless, who is going to decide weather something is fake or not (and for that, every parcel would have to be opened first so the PO guy can check what's in it) and even then, he wouldn't know a fake if you hit him in the head with it! Nor is that part of their job - to be experts in every brand that can potentially be a fake.
And, just looking on the boards, all those who receive one through the post never reported parcels being tampered with - they arrive to their address just fine.
But with all this - fake anything is never OK, even for those who can't afford the real thing and don't mind in the slightest being decked out in fakes.
It is stealing, making money of someone else's designs.
Just wandering while I think about it - where does that leave certain company from Spain with stores worldwide - world's biggest copycat - and making a forune out of it. As soon as something hits runways, almost identical item is mass produced, without the labels of the designer, of course, but the style, colours and fabrics are unmistakenly similar (same).
on 10-01-2018 03:59 PM
@iloveelena03-7 wrote:
u can only be charged with selling illegal if the company involved lay charges..only way anything will happen
And you can only be charged with shoplifting if the retailer involved decides to press charges - only way aything will happen.
on 10-01-2018 05:27 PM
it's basically all civil law..completely different to criminal law
on 10-01-2018 05:38 PM
if everything i said was not true.... ebay would not have deleted all my threads..
10-01-2018 05:44 PM - edited 10-01-2018 05:45 PM
@iloveelena03-7 wrote:it's basically all civil law..completely different to criminal law
You keep trying to defend yourself on technicalities, which - even if everything you were saying was 100% provable and correct (hint: it's not) - won't get you a better response. The only statement I've seen you make that was actually accurate and verifiable was that Aus Post provide cover for transit damage (yes, extra cover includes compensation for damage, if: the item was packaged to their standards, the damage is a direct result of Aus Post's actions / negligence, and they admit to it being so).
You've had at least two, maybe more, buyers who were dissatisfied with their purchase because they thought they were buying one thing and received another. I would be the first to defend a seller if they described the item accurately, thoroughly, left absolutely no room for doubt and did not attempt to obscure details for the sole purpose of covering their butt if a problem arises... If one buyer comes to a seller with a problem, it's reasonable to think it an anomaly and carry on. If 2+ buyers have the same problem, it's time to start examining why and taking the necessary steps to prevent it - JMHO the absolute last thing a conscientious seller would do is defend themselves by "I tossed "style" in the mix, so I'm good". Not many people will find that defensible.
on 10-01-2018 06:15 PM
You have already been told that Ebay do not control these boards, their reps rarely even visit. It is not Ebay that is causing your posting troubles, it is solely you. If you step back and examine your business practices, and your responses to answers by experienced Ebayers you might just get some help.
All you need to do is say, sorry, I was wrong, please help me fix this problem, or that area of my business. People are happy to help if you are willing to listen and put suggestions into place.
on 10-01-2018 06:27 PM
They never asked a question.
They just spammed about four different threads (initially) with how to sell fakes. So their current issues stem directly from that.