on โ07-03-2018 07:56 AM
I recenty bought a product thst lasted 20 seconds before it broke...ebay did not honour australian consumer law which states that a item must be fit for purpose...it clesrly wasnt..... how are they getting away with this? Has this happened to anybody else? Anybody taken ebay to consumer affairs? What was the outcome?
Solved! Go to Solution.
on โ21-03-2018 06:55 AM
on โ21-03-2018 06:57 AM
on โ21-03-2018 06:59 AM
on โ21-03-2018 07:03 AM
on โ21-03-2018 07:10 AM
on โ21-03-2018 07:24 AM
on โ21-03-2018 09:12 AM
Ebay and PayPal have in place the MBG so instead of going through that process you just decided to punish the sellers with negative feedback.
Your intent was to give negative feedback no matter what, instead of following ebay's policy, so your mind set from the start is what it is.
โ21-03-2018 10:18 AM - edited โ21-03-2018 10:19 AM
@itsjohnny1wrote:
if you look the feeback is over a period of time .. i only bother to leave negative feedback because ebay is a farce.. most transactions are fine but the ones i left negative feeback for were shockers. ๐
Most sellers won't care. If they take the opportunity to look, all they will see is a high proportion of negative feedback left for sellers, which makes you look like a high risk buyer - whether you are or not. Your feedback left for others is a bit like painting a self-portrait, and if you mostly choose to show the negative qualities, then that's all people will see.
on โ21-03-2018 11:39 AM
on โ21-03-2018 12:43 PM
I agree with digi and kollector, with the amount of negs showing on your feedback left for others sellers could easily perceive that you would be a problem buyer, and would deal with you as such.
Unfair maybe, but unfortunately sellers seeing a high amount of negs and not knowing that you often only leave feedback when things go pearshaped, will tend to draw an unfavorable view of your eBay transactions.