How would you best describe right wing propaganda?

[donnashuggy]

Fear would be my best description

Anyone else?

[goldenjet16]

"Gosh what a kerfuffle lol! All because of a throw away line in response tp someone elses comment. Talk about being on the defensive. And you need to ask what it is that I am afraid of lol??

Anyway, here is an article that sums a credible study done in 2012 by the fabulously clever people at BrockU: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2095549/Right-wingers-intelligent-left-wingers-says-c...


What a joke, written by some liberal, who doesn't mention the author of the study, and a second study done by a socialist university.

First paragraph...... "controversial new study"...

I have a bridge in Brooklyn for sale if your interested martini.... 😉

[tezza2844]

I see that your postings are getting very vindictive of late.

Are you sub-contracting for ligthingdance and nero_bolt ?.

I haven't seen much of lightingdance for a while, perhaps may be posting under a new identity?

[icyfroth]

---

@tezza2844 wrote:

I see that your postings are getting very vindictive of late.

Yes I've taken lessons from the experts.

Are you sub-contracting for ligthingdance and nero_bolt ?

It's a tough job but someone has to do it.

I haven't seen much of lightingdance for a while, perhaps may be posting under a new identity?

Who'd know, with all the new and zero ID's around?

---

[goldenjet16]

I'm not going to post for Icy, I think she speaks her mind, with a bit of sarcasm. I enjoy her post, she pulls no punches. I think for some she's brutally honest.

[icyfroth]

@ Jet 

[i-need-a-martini]

---

@goldenjet16 wrote:
"Gosh what a kerfuffle lol! All because of a throw away line in response tp someone elses comment. Talk about being on the defensive. And you need to ask what it is that I am afraid of lol??

Anyway, here is an article that sums a credible study done in 2012 by the fabulously clever people at BrockU: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2095549/Right-wingers-intelligent-left-wingers-says-c...


What a joke, written by some liberal, who doesn't mention the author of the study, and a second study done by a socialist university.

First paragraph...... "controversial new study"...

I have a bridge in Brooklyn for sale if your interested martini.... 😉

---

Huh?

It is written by Rob Waugh who's only interest in the subject is the statistics I imagine given his background.

And the 'author' of the study is mentioned in the article and I also mention it in my post - the Brock Uni.  And you think brock Uni is socialist? lol. 

Or do you mean who undertook the research? Again easy to find that it is a TEAM (are they all left winged lol?) lead by Gordon Hodson. And before you go off accusing him of being a 'liberal', he is a psychologist who has written some fascinating stuff on childhood discimmination. Perhaps you might like to read some?

And the study is an accumulation of various studies of children over decades. It isn't one mans crusade.

There is no "second" study so I don't know what you are talking about. I suspect from your post that neither do you as you are clearly confused.

You have a bridge for sale? I imagine you have a bridge for sale because (from the sounds of things) you were the only taker for it in the first place lol.

[icyfroth]

---

@i-need-a-martini wrote:

---

@goldenjet16 wrote:
"Gosh what a kerfuffle lol! All because of a throw away line in response tp someone elses comment. Talk about being on the defensive. And you need to ask what it is that I am afraid of lol??

Anyway, here is an article that sums a credible study done in 2012 by the fabulously clever people at BrockU: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2095549/Right-wingers-intelligent-left-wingers-says-c...


What a joke, written by some liberal, who doesn't mention the author of the study, and a second study done by a socialist university.

First paragraph...... "controversial new study"...

I have a bridge in Brooklyn for sale if your interested martini.... 😉

---

Huh?

It is written by Rob Waugh who's only interest in the subject is the statistics I imagine given his background.

And the 'author' of the study is mentioned in the article and I also mention it in my post - the Brock Uni.  And you think brock Uni is socialist? lol. 

Or do you mean who undertook the research? Again easy to find that it is a TEAM (are they all left winged lol?) lead by Gordon Hodson. And before you go off accusing him of being a 'liberal', he is a psychologist who has written some fascinating stuff on childhood discimmination. Perhaps you might like to read some?

And the study is an accumulation of various studies of children over decades. It isn't one mans crusade.

There is no "second" study so I don't know what you are talking about. I suspect from your post that neither do you as you are clearly confused.

You have a bridge for sale? I imagine you have a bridge for sale because (from the sounds of things) you were the only taker for it in the first place lol.

---

Aren't you a bit embarrassed to admit your only claim to intelligence rests on the fact that you are a lefty?

[i-need-a-martini]

---

@icyfroth wrote:

---

@i-need-a-martini wrote:

---

@goldenjet16 wrote:
"Gosh what a kerfuffle lol! All because of a throw away line in response tp someone elses comment. Talk about being on the defensive. And you need to ask what it is that I am afraid of lol??

Anyway, here is an article that sums a credible study done in 2012 by the fabulously clever people at BrockU: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2095549/Right-wingers-intelligent-left-wingers-says-c...


What a joke, written by some liberal, who doesn't mention the author of the study, and a second study done by a socialist university.

First paragraph...... "controversial new study"...

I have a bridge in Brooklyn for sale if your interested martini.... 😉

---

Huh?

It is written by Rob Waugh who's only interest in the subject is the statistics I imagine given his background.

And the 'author' of the study is mentioned in the article and I also mention it in my post - the Brock Uni.  And you think brock Uni is socialist? lol. 

Or do you mean who undertook the research? Again easy to find that it is a TEAM (are they all left winged lol?) lead by Gordon Hodson. And before you go off accusing him of being a 'liberal', he is a psychologist who has written some fascinating stuff on childhood discimmination. Perhaps you might like to read some?

And the study is an accumulation of various studies of children over decades. It isn't one mans crusade.

There is no "second" study so I don't know what you are talking about. I suspect from your post that neither do you as you are clearly confused.

You have a bridge for sale? I imagine you have a bridge for sale because (from the sounds of things) you were the only taker for it in the first place lol.

---

Aren't you a bit embarrassed to admit your only claim to intelligence rests on the fact that you are a lefty?

---

I didn't make any claims.

I didn't even say I agreed with the article or the study.

All I did was bring forth the facts when the question came up.

[goldenjet16]

What did you not get, a "controversial new study" why controversial. Brock University used study done by two UK studies. You don't think university's are liberal?

"The study, by academics at Brock University in Ontario, Canada, used information from two UK studies from 1958 and 1970 , where several thousand children were assessed for intelligence at age 10 and 11, and then asked political questions aged 33.
The 1958 National Child Development involved 4,267 men and 4,537 women born in 1958."

I read the article there's a few may be's. Seems to me a study was done in the UK and another follow up by Brock university. I'm not buying it, but you want it to be true so go ahead.

"All I did was bring forth the facts when the question came up."

IMO I would say this study is not fact. There's probably another study that says conservatives are smarter than libs.

[goldenjet16]

The far left leans toward socialism, and that creates complacency and people becoming lethargic thinkers. No will or want to exceed when you can get the same benefits, the payoff is the same or controlled by government.

Why would billy work hard for an "A" when Johnny does no hard work and gets an "F" and they both end up with a "C". Why would Billy continue to work hard with no reward. When all his hard work is given away to benefit Johnny

Take a good look at this current administration in the U.S and you have no argument. The study fails mercilessly.